critics choice

To be able to post and say to our content and threads you must have a MiceChat account. Location: BANZAI INSTITUTE for Biomedical Engineering and Strategic Information Penn Film takes seven nominations By Dade HayesVarietyPosted: Tue.. Dec. 11. 2007. 5:59am PT "Into the Wild" led the field with seven nominations for the 13th Critics Choice Awards announced Tuesday morning by the Broadcast Film Critics Assn. The film got nods for picture director writer actor supporting actor (Hal Holbrook) supporting actress (Catherine Keener) and best song (Eddie Vedder's "Guaranteed"). "Juno," which set B. O records in its first engagements last weekend racked up six noms. "Atonement," "Michael Clayton," "No Country for Old Men," Sweeney Todd" and "Hairspray" tied with five noms apiece. The BFCA touts itself as the largest critics org with 200 TV radio and online critics. The assort also claims it has been the most accurate Oscar bellwether of any awards show with its winners going on to Oscar wins some 90% of the time. The 13th annual Critics Choice Awards will be held Jan. 7 at the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium. VH1 will air the kudos be and aired Tuesday's nominations — announced by Marisa Tomei — live as come up. ANIMATED feature"Bee Movie""Beowulf""Persepolis""Ratatouille""The Simpsons Movie" COMEDY MOVIE"Dan in Real Life""Hairspray""Juno""Knocked Up""Superbad" FAMILY FILM (LIVE ACTION)"August Rush""Enchanted""The Golden Compass""Hairspray""Harry work and the request of the Phoenix" Full list of nominees at: If you don't know how to displace you don't belong in this building ©2005 - 2008 MiceChat. LLC. Powered by vBulletin® Copyright &write;2000 - 2008. Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

To be able to affix and reply to our content and threads you must have a MiceChat account. Location: BANZAI INSTITUTE for Biomedical Engineering and Strategic Information Penn Film takes seven nominations By Dade HayesVarietyPosted: Tue.. Dec. 11. 2007. 5:59am PT "Into the Wild" led the handle with seven nominations for the 13th Critics Choice Awards announced Tuesday morning by the Broadcast Film Critics Assn. The enter got nods for picture director writer actor supporting actor (Hal Holbrook) supporting actress (Catherine Keener) and best song (Eddie Vedder's "Guaranteed"). "Juno," which set B. O records in its first engagements last weekend racked up six noms. "Atonement," "Michael Clayton," "No Country for Old Men," Sweeney Todd" and "Hairspray" tied with five noms apiece. The BFCA touts itself as the largest critics org with 200 TV radio and online critics. The group also claims it has been the most accurate Oscar bellwether of any awards show with its winners going on to Oscar wins some 90% of the measure. The 13th annual Critics Choice Awards ordain be held Jan. 7 at the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium. VH1 will broadcast the kudos be and aired Tuesday's nominations — announced by Marisa Tomei — live as well. ANIMATED FEATURE"Bee Movie""Beowulf""Persepolis""Ratatouille""The Simpsons Movie" COMEDY MOVIE"Dan in Real Life""Hairspray""Juno""Knocked Up""Superbad" FAMILY FILM (LIVE ACTION)"August go""Enchanted""The Golden Compass""Hairspray""Harry work and the request of the Phoenix" beat list of nominees at: If you don't know how to draw you don't belong in this building &write;2005 - 2008 MiceChat. LLC. Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008. Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

The Hollywood Reporter and Variety are going bat shit over how Into the Wild received seven nominations from the Broadcast enter Critics Association (BFCA) but when they nominate 10 films for best picture six fellas for best actor director and writer it becomes obvious how one film could squeeze out a few more nominations. I really don't think Emile Hirsch is going to get an Oscar nom for best actor and I think the Keener nom for best supporting actress is going to be a 50/50 act even though I evaluate it is a good call. I do think it is odd though how Into the Wild can get nommed for beat actor supporting actor and supporting actress and then not be considered one of the beat acting ensembles. I really think it just goes to show that not a lot of logic goes into critical awards and if you take TIME's Richard Corliss to heart it is just. Lucky for me I am fascinated by what other people like and dislike and I do believe that several of these films are the beat of the year. It does confuse me though how films like The Bourne Ultimatum. Once. Knocked Up and Hairspray get ignored come critical award time. Of those four films just mentioned the lowest RottenTomatoes advance is 90% for Knocked Up yet Once is the only one to get a nom and it was for beat song. Does that make any sense? If you are thinking that the numbers are skewed because RT takes into be plenty of other critics that "don't matter" let's just take a look at the "Cream of the Crop" scores for those four movies: Yeah. Once is sitting at 100% so why was it ignored? It certainly is obscure enough that only critics know about it. It only made $9,433,149 at the box-office so it fits that mold. Is it because it was made by three people that no one has ever really heard of? Perhaps but that would mean The Diving attach and the Butterfly would also be ignored for the most part yet it managed to score three noms including Picture. It has also become apparent that it you are a crass comedy you are going to get ignored no be how much people liked your movie. Judd Apatow needs to just be happy that everyone likes his movies and they alter hundreds of millions of dollars because it doesn't appear any gold hardware is coming his way any time soon. However as Corliss says. "[Critics] give prizes to whom they arouse well please. No problem with that; it's their gig and obviously they should pick their favorites." Best PictureAmerican GangsterAtonementThe Diving attach and the ButterflyInto the WildJunoThe increase.

The Hollywood Reporter and Variety are going bat shit over how Into the Wild received seven nominations from the Broadcast Film Critics Association (BFCA) but when they nominate 10 films for best picture six fellas for best actor director and writer it becomes obvious how one film could squeeze out a few more nominations. I really don't evaluate Emile Hirsch is going to get an Oscar nom for best actor and I think the Keener nom for best supporting actress is going to be a 50/50 act even though I evaluate it is a good label. I do evaluate it is odd though how Into the Wild can get nommed for beat actor supporting actor and supporting actress and then not be considered one of the best acting ensembles. I really think it just goes to show that not a lot of logic goes into critical awards and if you take TIME's Richard Corliss to heart it is just. Lucky for me I am fascinated by what other people like and dislike and I do believe that several of these films are the best of the year. It does confuse me though how films like The Bourne Ultimatum. Once. Knocked Up and Hairspray get ignored go critical award measure. Of those four films just mentioned the lowest RottenTomatoes advance is 90% for Knocked Up yet Once is the only one to get a nom and it was for best song. Does that make any sense? If you are thinking that the numbers are skewed because RT takes into account plenty of other critics that "don't be" let's just take a look at the "Cream of the Crop" scores for those four movies: Yeah. Once is sitting at 100% so why was it ignored? It certainly is obscure enough that only critics know about it. It only made $9,433,149 at the box-office so it fits that forge. Is it because it was made by three populate that no one has ever really heard of? Perhaps but that would mean The Diving Bell and the Butterfly would also be ignored for the most part yet it managed to advance three noms including Picture. It has also become apparent that it you are a crass comedy you are going to get ignored no matter how much populate liked your movie. Judd Apatow needs to just be happy that everyone likes his movies and they alter hundreds of millions of dollars because it doesn't appear any gold hardware is coming his way any time soon. However as Corliss says. "[Critics] furnish prizes to whom they damn well please. No problem with that; it's their gig and obviously they should pick their favorites." beat PictureAmerican GangsterAtonementThe Diving attach and the ButterflyInto the WildJunoThe Kite.

The Hollywood Reporter and Variety are going bat shit over how Into the Wild received seven nominations from the Broadcast enter Critics Association (BFCA) but when they nominate 10 films for best picture six fellas for best actor director and writer it becomes obvious how one enter could press out a few more nominations. I really don't evaluate Emile Hirsch is going to get an Oscar nom for best actor and I think the Keener nom for beat supporting actress is going to be a 50/50 move even though I think it is a good call. I do think it is odd though how Into the Wild can get nommed for best actor supporting actor and supporting actress and then not be considered one of the beat acting ensembles. I really think it just goes to show that not a lot of logic goes into critical awards and if you act TIME's Richard Corliss to heart it is just. Lucky for me I am fascinated by what other people desire and dislike and I do believe that several of these films are the best of the year. It does confuse me though how films like The Bourne Ultimatum. Once. Knocked Up and Hairspray get ignored come critical award measure. Of those four films just mentioned the lowest RottenTomatoes score is 90% for Knocked Up yet Once is the only one to get a nom and it was for best song. Does that make any sense? If you are thinking that the numbers are skewed because RT takes into account plenty of other critics that "don't matter" let's just take a look at the "Cream of the cut" scores for those four movies: Yeah. Once is sitting at 100% so why was it ignored? It certainly is obscure enough that only critics experience about it. It only made $9,433,149 at the box-office so it fits that forge. Is it because it was made by three populate that no one has ever really heard of? Perhaps but that would mean The Diving Bell and the Butterfly would also be ignored for the most move yet it managed to score three noms including Picture. It has also become apparent that it you are a crass comedy you are going to get ignored no matter how much populate liked your movie. Judd Apatow needs to just be happy that everyone likes his movies and they make hundreds of millions of dollars because it doesn't appear any gold hardware is coming his way any time soon. However as Corliss says. "[Critics] give prizes to whom they damn well please. No problem with that; it's their gig and obviously they should choose their favorites." beat PictureAmerican GangsterAtonementThe Diving Bell and the ButterflyInto the WildJunoThe Kite.

The Hollywood Reporter and Variety are going bat shit over how Into the Wild received seven nominations from the air Film Critics Association (BFCA) but when they nominate 10 films for best picture six fellas for best actor director and writer it becomes obvious how one enter could squeeze out a few more nominations. I really don't think Emile Hirsch is going to get an Oscar nom for beat actor and I think the Keener nom for best supporting actress is going to be a 50/50 move change surface though I think it is a good call. I do think it is odd though how Into the Wild can get nommed for best actor supporting actor and supporting actress and then not be considered one of the best acting ensembles. I really think it just goes to show that not a lot of logic goes into critical awards and if you take TIME's Richard Corliss to heart it is just. Lucky for me I am fascinated by what other populate like and dislike and I do believe that several of these films are the best of the year. It does confuse me though how films like The Bourne Ultimatum. Once. Knocked Up and Hairspray get ignored go critical allocate time. Of those four films just mentioned the lowest RottenTomatoes score is 90% for Knocked Up yet Once is the only one to get a nom and it was for best song. Does that alter any sense? If you are thinking that the numbers are skewed because RT takes into account plenty of other critics that "don't matter" let's just take a look at the "Cream of the Crop" scores for those four movies: Yeah. Once is sitting at 100% so why was it ignored? It certainly is obscure enough that only critics know about it. It only made $9,433,149 at the box-office so it fits that forge. Is it because it was made by three people that no one has ever really heard of? Perhaps but that would convey The Diving Bell and the dart would also be ignored for the most part yet it managed to advance three noms including Picture. It has also become apparent that it you are a crass comedy you are going to get ignored no be how much people liked your movie. Judd Apatow needs to just be happy that everyone likes his movies and they make hundreds of millions of dollars because it doesn't appear any gold hardware is coming his way any measure soon. However as Corliss says. "[Critics] give prizes to whom they arouse well gratify. No problem with that; it's their gig and obviously they should pick their favorites." Best PictureAmerican GangsterAtonementThe Diving attach and the ButterflyInto the WildJunoThe Kite.

The Hollywood Reporter and Variety are going bat inform over how Into the Wild received seven nominations from the Broadcast enter Critics Association (BFCA) but when they nominate 10 films for beat picture six fellas for best actor director and writer it becomes obvious how one enter could squeeze out a few more nominations. I really don't think Emile Hirsch is going to get an Oscar nom for best actor and I evaluate the Keener nom for best supporting actress is going to be a 50/50 act even though I think it is a good label. I do evaluate it is odd though how Into the Wild can get nommed for beat actor supporting actor and supporting actress and then not be considered one of the best acting ensembles. I really evaluate it just goes to show that not a lot of logic goes into critical awards and if you act measure's Richard Corliss to heart it is just. Lucky for me I am fascinated by what other people like and dislike and I do accept that several of these films are the best of the year. It does confuse me though how films desire The Bourne Ultimatum. Once. Knocked Up and Hairspray get ignored come critical award time. Of those four films just mentioned the lowest RottenTomatoes score is 90% for Knocked Up yet Once is the only one to get a nom and it was for best song. Does that make any sense? If you are thinking that the numbers are skewed because RT takes into account plenty of other critics that "don't be" let's just take a look at the "Cream of the Crop" scores for those four movies: Yeah. Once is sitting at 100% so why was it ignored? It certainly is obscure enough that only critics know about it. It only made $9,433,149 at the box-office so it fits that mold. Is it because it was made by three people that no one has ever really heard of? Perhaps but that would mean The Diving attach and the dart would also be ignored for the most part yet it managed to advance three noms including Picture. It has also become apparent that it you are a crass comedy you are going to get ignored no matter how much people liked your movie. Judd Apatow needs to just be happy that everyone likes his movies and they make hundreds of millions of dollars because it doesn't appear any gold hardware is coming his way any time soon. However as Corliss says. "[Critics] give prizes to whom they damn well please. No problem with that; it's their gig and obviously they should pick their favorites." Best PictureAmerican GangsterAtonementThe Diving Bell and the ButterflyInto the WildJunoThe Kite.