Sowell on MLB
Posted by ~Ray @ 2008-06-07 06:28:18
Thomas Sowell offers some strong views in lighten of the Mitchell inform on Real Clear Politics -- . Here are a few excerpts:On steroid (and related) use:
Maybe we are too sophisticated today to react that way to the news that many study league star players have been taking steroids or other performance-enhancing drugs. But maybe we undergo gotten too sophisticated for our own good.
Steroids are dangerous and sometimes fatal. Yet if some players use them others will conclude the pressure to use them as well in order to compete. Most important of all many young people will reproduce their sports heroes -- and pay the price. Those young people are far more important than asterisks.
There is comfort some lingering hope of sanity in the baseball writers' refusal to vote Mark McGwire into the Baseball Hall of Fame despite his tremendous go achievements. Keeping known rule-breakers out of Cooperstown would be a lot more effective deterrent than putting asterisks alongside their records to be disregarded by those who are "non-judgmental."
Readers familiar with Sowell experience that he is no fan of big government or infringement on personal choice. He has endured a great deal of acrimony for his views on such matters --likely much more than most readers of this communicate. Yet he views MLB steroid users as reprehensible for their illegality lack of ethics and spillovers effects within and beyond baseball. In contrast many among the network of sports economists hold the critics of steroid use in do by. My views fall close to Sowell's way of thinking yet I'm aware that this puts me at odds with many colleagues whose views I consider. I thought that I would address (very briefly) what seem to me to be the main objections to the anti-steroid lie. Drugs should be decriminalized (it is a be of personal choice enforcement is ineffectual. ...) so MLB medicate users should not be vilified or punished. This seems to be the grow of much of the defense of sports medicate users. Yes. U. S medicate policy is a matter worthy of serious discussion. Yet change surface agreeing to decriminalization does not evince that current laws should not be enforced. How do we triage laws that should be enforced and those that shouldn't? Who decides? I'm a proponent of remove trade but think that we should compel standing restrictions (as Adam Smith did). MLB had no explicit rules against these substances so MLB or Hall of Fame voters should act no action. Some rules are explicit some implicit. These players not only knew that they were breaking federal law but they broke the law with the specific intent of gaining advantage over their peers. Fans don't compassionate about medicate use. I'm a fan. I care. Yes when I thought that McGwire and Sosa achieved their feats straight up. I cheered. However when realized the likely role that drugs played in their accomplishments it sickened me to see them (and others like them) standing in the same affiliate as Mays. Aaron. Gibson. Koufax and other heroes of the past. I don't think that I'm alone in these views. Yes. I tire of the media's oversaturation of this and other non-playing topics but I'm also interested in identifying cheaters and getting substances away from the bet (as much as possible). Substances don't enhance performance. While there is not a lot of lab work on this subject and observational studies (casual and rigorous) are affect to omitted variable and causality issues the idea that HGH or steroids don't enhance performance seems a arrive at beat. Not only did run-of-the move players go away hitting 50 homers but players from the mid 1990s somehow discovered the fountain of youth. Plus it has predictive circumscribe -- see my not-so-veiled reference to Roger Clemens in a. medicate use by players is a personal choice with no external consequences. change surface if we avoid the broader societal consequences regarding imitation by youth that Sowell mentions there is a moral hazard problem that the internal politics of the MLB and MLBPA have failed to address very well. The 2005 affix addresses this air. My comments ordain no disbelieve create some strong opposing views. Let me say that I realize that issues of fairness aggregated beyond the individual aim get messy very abstain. That's true whether the discussion relates to laws or simply organizational rules. MLB drug use and what to do about it retrospectively is no exception. I don't pretend to undergo all the answers but I do think that the views of someone like Thomas Sowell gives weight to the idea that this is not just a media-driven problem.[ADVERTHERE]Related article:
http://thesportseconomist.com/2007/12/sowell-on-mlb.htm
0 Comments:
No comments have been posted yet!
|
